top of page

Zed Black Accused of Submitting False Documents

Zed Black, a prominent name in the incense industry, has found itself embroiled in controversy as allegations of submitting false documents to the trademark office have surfaced. The allegations revolve around their opposition to the Gayaveda brand, raising questions about the credibility of the claims made by Zed Black and their intentions. This article delves into the details of this dispute and the potential consequences for both parties involved.


Zed Black, known for its incense products, operates in a highly competitive market. Trademarks are crucial in distinguishing their products from those of their competitors, and the protection of these trademarks is vital for maintaining a strong market presence. The Gayaveda brand, a rising star in the herbal wellness and incense sector, applied for trademark protection for its name and products.

The Accusation

The dispute arose when Zed Black filed an opposition against the trademark application made by Gayaveda. They alleged that Gayaveda's trademark application was invalid because of the brand's supposed similarity to their own. Zed Black's claim primarily hinged on the assertion that they had prior rights over the Gayaveda name and products.

However, Gayaveda vehemently denied this assertion and accused Zed Black of submitting false documents to back their opposition. According to Gayaveda, Zed Black allegedly presented fabricated evidence of prior use, misleading the trademark office and intentionally obstructing their application process. These allegations have cast a shadow of doubt over Zed Black's conduct in the matter.

The Consequences

The allegations against Zed Black, if proven true, could have severe legal and reputational consequences. False submissions to a trademark office are considered a breach of intellectual property laws and can result in legal penalties, including fines and even imprisonment in some cases. Moreover, the credibility of the brand could be significantly damaged, affecting its standing in the market.

On the other hand, Gayaveda's reputation could be impacted as well if their accusations are found to be false or if they fail to secure the trademark for their brand. Such disputes can be lengthy and costly, diverting resources from the core business activities of both parties.


The allegations against Zed Black for submitting false documents in opposition to the Gayaveda brand's trademark application are a matter of concern not only for the companies involved but also for the intellectual property community at large. As the dispute unfolds, it will be essential to await the decision of the trademark office and any potential legal proceedings that may follow.

This situation serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency, integrity, and ethics in the business world, particularly when it comes to matters of intellectual property. The resolution of this case will undoubtedly have far-reaching implications for both Zed Black and Gayaveda, and it will be interesting to see how the truth ultimately emerges and the consequences that may follow.

14 views0 comments


bottom of page